posts: 96
Data license: CC BY
This data as json
| id | title | slug | date | year | month | category | url | body_html | body_text | links_out_json |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96 | mag cover design decline shock | mag_cover_desig.html | 2004-02-20 | 2004 | 2 | interesting | https://www.russelldavies.com/typepad/russelldavies.typepad.com/planning/2004/02/mag_cover_desig.html | <p><img alt="magcovers.gif" border="0" height="248" src="../../magcovers.gif" width="365"/></p> <p>There's a great little piece <a href="http://www.designobserver.com/archives/000103.html">here </a>(via <a href="http://www.thingsmagazine.net">things</a>) about the decline in American magazine design. From the heights of Esquire etc in the 60s to the celebrity obssessed type nightmares of today. A good, quick read.</p> <p>Not so sure if it's as true about British magazines. I'm not saying that Nuts and Now are great pieces of design, I'm just not sure we ever had an equivalent golden age.</p> | There's a great little piece here (via things ) about the decline in American magazine design. From the heights of Esquire etc in the 60s to the celebrity obssessed type nightmares of today. A good, quick read. Not so sure if it's as true about British magazines. I'm not saying that Nuts and Now are great pieces of design, I'm just not sure we ever had an equivalent golden age. | ["http://www.designobserver.com/archives/000103.html", "http://www.thingsmagazine.net"] |